Teaching Evaluations

My approach to teaching generally results in positive comments from students. Some examples of student responses to the question “What are the teachers’ strengths in teaching?” and “The best features of this teachers’ teaching were:” on student evaluation forms are given below:

“knows the content well, lectures were clear/understandable, notes were brilliant”

“interaction with the class is good through the use of explaining concepts and then testing us on our understanding of them”

“explaining difficult concepts to be easily understood, helpful to students needs and well organized and structured lecture notes”

The formal student evaluation scores shown in the Table below demonstrate that courses that I teach are well received by students. The score in the last column of the table is the student’s response to the question ”Overall I was satisfied with this course“ where a score of 6 corresponds to “strongly agree” and a score of 1 corresponds to “strongly disagree”.

YearCourseScore
2011ZEIT4225 Satellite Communications5.5
ZEIT3219 Programmable Digital Systems5.67
2012ZEIT4225 Satellite Communications5.5
ZEIT8219 Satellite Communications5.33
ZEIT3219 Programmable Digital Systems5.5
2013ZEIT8219 Satellite Communications5.5
ZEIT3219 Programmable Digital Systems5.25
2014ZEIT8219 Satellite Communications3.5
2015ZEIT2208 Programmable Digital Systems5.22
ZEIT8013 Space Applications 14.5
ZEIT8219 Satellite Communications5.2
2016ZEIT2208 Programmable Digital Systems5.15
ZEIT8013 Space Applications 14.5
2017ZEIT2208 Programmable Digital Systems3.24
2018ZEIT2208 Programmable Digital Systems3.5
ZEIT4230 Electrical Engineering Design Practice4.67
2020ZEIT2208 Programmable Digital Systems4.42
Median5.2